01Program
Third-party and vendor risk management, proportionate to vendor access
A right-sized vendor risk program: tiering, assessment, contract security requirements and ongoing monitoring, proportionate to how much access each vendor really has.
- Name
- Third-Party Risk Management
- Line
- 01 · Cybersecurity
- Type
- Outcome program, combines several practices
01The problem
Identical questionnaires verify nothing.
Vendor breaches and supply chain compromise are a common route into organizations, while questionnaire-based programs assess everyone identically and verify nothing. Effort goes where the spreadsheet says, not where the access is.
02Scope
What the third-party risk program covers.
- Vendor inventory and tiering
- Risk-proportionate assessment methodology
- Contract security requirements and review
- Technical validation for critical vendors
- Ongoing monitoring program
- Integration with GRC and risk reporting
03Approach
How a third-party risk engagement runs.
The assessment methodology is designed to be defensible under GDPR, DORA, the DPDP Act and sector regulation. The same method informs the design of [GRC](/products/grc), which is in development.
Tier by blast radius
Vendors ranked by data access and operational dependence, because your payroll processor and your stationery supplier are not the same risk.
Assess proportionately
Attestation review for low tiers. Technical validation and contract scrutiny for the vendors that could actually hurt you.
Monitor what matters
Continuous monitoring and renewal-driven reassessment for high-impact vendors, integrated with your risk register.
04Outcomes
What the third-party risk program is built to achieve.
- Vendor inventory tiered by data access and blast radius
- Assessment depth matched to tier: from attestation review to technical validation
- Security requirements embedded in contracts and renewals
- Continuous monitoring for your highest-impact vendors
When this work fits
- Organizations sending identical questionnaires to every vendor regardless of access
- Companies whose vendors hold sensitive data or administrative access to systems
- Financial entities preparing for DORA requirements on ICT third-party risk
- Procurement and security teams lacking a shared vendor inventory and tiering
05Questions
Third-party risk: questions we are asked
Tiering rests on two questions: what can the vendor reach, and what stops if the vendor fails. Inputs include the type and volume of data handled, whether the vendor holds credentials or network access into your environment, whether it supports a critical business function, and how hard it would be to replace. A payroll processor or a managed service provider with administrative access sits in the top tier. A supplier with no data and no access needs little beyond a contract clause.
Assessment depth follows the tier. Low tiers get a short review of existing assurance: an ISO 27001 certificate read with its scope statement, or a SOC 2 report read for exceptions and for the controls left to you. Middle tiers answer a questionnaire cut down to the services they provide. Top tiers add evidence requests, architecture discussions and, where the contract allows, technical validation such as penetration testing of the integration. Verification increases with the access involved.
Clauses worth having for higher tiers include the security standard the vendor must maintain, breach notification with a defined deadline and contact, the right to audit or to receive independent assurance reports, notice or approval of subcontractors, data location, return and deletion of data at exit, and cooperation during incidents. Requirements scale down for lower tiers. We draft the security schedule and review vendor paper alongside your legal counsel. Legal advice remains with your lawyers.
Point-in-time assessments age quickly, so high-tier vendors are watched between reviews. Sources include external attack surface observation, breach and leaked-credential reporting from threat intelligence, expiry dates on certificates and assurance reports, and news of ownership or service changes. Defined triggers, such as a disclosed breach or a change in the data handled, start an out-of-cycle reassessment. Lower tiers are reassessed at contract renewal. Findings feed the same risk register as your internal risks.
Each framework asks for the same core practice. ISO 27001 Annex A covers supplier relationships in controls 5.19 to 5.23, including supplier agreements, the ICT supply chain and cloud services. SOC 2 addresses vendor risk under criterion CC9.2. DORA requires financial entities in the EU to keep a register of ICT third-party arrangements, include specific contract provisions and plan exit strategies. We align the program to the frameworks that apply, so one vendor file serves each audit. See compliance frameworks.
Often alongside
